English
TRANSFORMATION OF THE MENTOR-STUDENT RELATIONSHIP MODEL IN THE DIGITAL EDUCATION ENVIRONMENT
Дата публикации
23.06.2026
Журнал
Концептуальные основы фундаментальных, прикладных и инновационных исследований в трансформации педагогического образования и воспитания
Выпуск
Сборник материалов международной научно-практической конференции на тему: «Концептуальные основы фундаментальных, прикладных и инновационных исследований в трансформации педагогического образования и воспитания»
Аннотация
This article analyzes, from scientific-theoretical and empirical perspectives, the transformation of the mentor-student relationship from its traditional pedagogical model to new forms in the digital education environment. It is substantiated that digital technologies — artificial intelligence, distance learning platforms, and virtual collaboration tools — are fundamentally changing the content, form, and direction of the relationship between mentor and student.
Ключевые слова
artificial intelligence and education
digital education
digital transformation
e-mentoring
hybrid mentoring
mentor-student relationship
online pedagogy
pedagogical relationship.
teacher-student tradition
Oʻzbekcha
Ushbu maqolada ustoz-shogird munosabatlarining an'anaviy pedagogik modeldan raqamli ta'lim muhitidagi yangi shakllarga transformatsiyalashuvi ilmiy-nazariy va empirik jihatdan tahlil qilinadi. Raqamli texnologiyalar — sun'iy intellekt, masofaviy ta'lim platformalari va virtual hamkorlik vositalari ustoz va shogird o‘rtasidagi munosabatlarning mazmuni, shakli hamda yo‘nalishini tubdan o‘zgartirayotgani asoslab berilgan.
e-mentoring
gibrid mentoriing
onlayn pedagogika
pedagogik munosabat.
raqamli ta'lim
raqamli transformatsiya
sun'iy intellekt va ta'lim
ustoz-shogird an'anasi
ustoz-shogird munosabatlari
Русский
В данной статье с научно-теоретической и эмпирической точек зрения анализируется трансформация отношений «наставник-ученик» от традиционной педагогической модели к новым формам в цифровой образовательной среде. Обосновано, что цифровые технологии — искусственный интеллект, платформы дистанционного обучения и инструменты виртуального сотрудничества — коренным образом меняют содержание, форму и направленность взаимодействия между наставником и учеником.
e-mentoring
гибридное наставничество
искусственный интеллект и образование
онлайн-педагогика
отношения наставника и ученика
педагогическое взаимодействие.
традиция «учитель-ученик»
цифровая трансформация
цифровое образование
1. Anderson, T. (2008). The Theory and Practice of Online Learning (2nd ed.). Edmonton: Athabasca University Press.
2. Bierema, L.L., & Merriam, S.B. (2002). E-Mentoring: Using Computer Mediated Communication to Enhance the Mentoring Process. Innovative Higher Education, 26(3), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017921023103
3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
4. Ensher, E.A., & Murphy, S.E. (2007). E-Mentoring: Next-Generation Research Strategies and Suggestions. In B.R. Ragins & K.E. Kram (Eds.), The Handbook of Mentoring at Work (pp. 299–322). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Al-Farabi, Abu Nasr Muhammad (10th century). Al-Madina al-Fadila (The Virtuous City). (Uzbek translation: Tashkent: Akademiya, 2015).
6. Gilles, D., & Hegde, P. (2020). AI-Augmented Mentoring: Possibilities and Ethical Boundaries. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 23(4), 44–57.
7. Haggard, D.L., Dougherty, T.W., Turban, D.B., & Wilbanks, J.E. (2011). Who Is a Mentor? A Review of Evolving Definitions and Implications for Research. Journal of Management, 37(1), 280–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310386227
8. Hamilton, B.A., & Scandura, T.A. (2003). E-Mentoring: Implications for Organizational Learning and Development in a Wired World. Organizational Dynamics, 31(4), 388–402.
9. Herrera, C., Kauh, T.J., Cooney, S.M., Grossman, J.B., & McMaken, J. (2008). High School Students as Mentors: Findings from the Big Brothers Big Sisters School-Based Mentoring Impact Study. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.
10. Ibn Sina, Abu Ali (11th century). Kitab ash-Shifa. (Uzbek translation: Tashkent: Fan, 1980).
11. Kim, J., & Park, S. (2021). Flipped Mentoring in Higher Education: A Case Study from South Korea. Asia-Pacific Journal of Education, 41(2), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1798477
12. Kram, K.E. (1983). Phases of the Mentor Relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 608–625. https://doi.org/10.2307/255910
13. Kram, K.E. (1985). Mentoring at Work: Developmental Relationships in Organizational Life. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
14. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Rollag, K. (2010). Teaching Business Cases Online Through Discussion Boards: Strategies and Best Practices. Journal of Management Education, 34(4), 499–526.
16. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.
17. Single, P.B., & Muller, C.B. (1999). Electronic Mentoring: Issues to Advance Research and Practice. Paper presented at the International Mentoring Association Conference, Atlanta, GA.
18. UNESCO (2020). Education: From Disruption to Recovery. Paris: UNESCO. https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse
19. van der Krogt, F. (2020). Peer Mentoring in the Digital Age: Lessons from Delft University of Technology. European Journal of Engineering Education, 45(5), 756–771.
20. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V.I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic Review of Research on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Higher Education—Where Are the Educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
