English
TRANSFORMATION OF THE MENTOR-STUDENT RELATIONSHIP MODEL IN THE DIGITAL EDUCATION ENVIRONMENT
Jurnal
Pedagogik ta’lim va tarbiya transformatsiyasida fundamental, amaliy va innovatsion tadqiqotlarning konseptual asoslari
Nashr
Pedagogik ta’lim va tarbiya transformatsiyasida fundamental, amaliy va innovatsion tadqiqotlarning konseptual asoslari xalqaro ilmiy-amaliy anjuman (2026-yil, 23-iyun)
Annotatsiya
This article analyzes, from scientific-theoretical and empirical perspectives, the transformation of the mentor-student relationship from its traditional pedagogical model to new forms in the digital education environment. It is substantiated that digital technologies — artificial intelligence, distance learning platforms, and virtual collaboration tools — are fundamentally changing the content, form, and direction of the relationship between mentor and student.
Kalit so‘zlar
artificial intelligence and education
digital education
digital transformation
e-mentoring
hybrid mentoring
mentor-student relationship
online pedagogy
pedagogical relationship.
teacher-student tradition
Oʻzbekcha
Ushbu maqolada ustoz-shogird munosabatlarining an'anaviy pedagogik modeldan raqamli ta'lim muhitidagi yangi shakllarga transformatsiyalashuvi ilmiy-nazariy va empirik jihatdan tahlil qilinadi. Raqamli texnologiyalar — sun'iy intellekt, masofaviy ta'lim platformalari va virtual hamkorlik vositalari ustoz va shogird o‘rtasidagi munosabatlarning mazmuni, shakli hamda yo‘nalishini tubdan o‘zgartirayotgani asoslab berilgan.
e-mentoring
gibrid mentoriing
onlayn pedagogika
pedagogik munosabat.
raqamli ta'lim
raqamli transformatsiya
sun'iy intellekt va ta'lim
ustoz-shogird an'anasi
ustoz-shogird munosabatlari
Русский
В данной статье с научно-теоретической и эмпирической точек зрения анализируется трансформация отношений «наставник-ученик» от традиционной педагогической модели к новым формам в цифровой образовательной среде. Обосновано, что цифровые технологии — искусственный интеллект, платформы дистанционного обучения и инструменты виртуального сотрудничества — коренным образом меняют содержание, форму и направленность взаимодействия между наставником и учеником.
e-mentoring
гибридное наставничество
искусственный интеллект и образование
онлайн-педагогика
отношения наставника и ученика
педагогическое взаимодействие.
традиция «учитель-ученик»
цифровая трансформация
цифровое образование
1. Anderson, T. (2008). The Theory and Practice of Online Learning (2nd ed.). Edmonton: Athabasca University Press.
2. Bierema, L.L., & Merriam, S.B. (2002). E-Mentoring: Using Computer Mediated Communication to Enhance the Mentoring Process. Innovative Higher Education, 26(3), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017921023103
3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
4. Ensher, E.A., & Murphy, S.E. (2007). E-Mentoring: Next-Generation Research Strategies and Suggestions. In B.R. Ragins & K.E. Kram (Eds.), The Handbook of Mentoring at Work (pp. 299–322). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Al-Farabi, Abu Nasr Muhammad (10th century). Al-Madina al-Fadila (The Virtuous City). (Uzbek translation: Tashkent: Akademiya, 2015).
6. Gilles, D., & Hegde, P. (2020). AI-Augmented Mentoring: Possibilities and Ethical Boundaries. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 23(4), 44–57.
7. Haggard, D.L., Dougherty, T.W., Turban, D.B., & Wilbanks, J.E. (2011). Who Is a Mentor? A Review of Evolving Definitions and Implications for Research. Journal of Management, 37(1), 280–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310386227
8. Hamilton, B.A., & Scandura, T.A. (2003). E-Mentoring: Implications for Organizational Learning and Development in a Wired World. Organizational Dynamics, 31(4), 388–402.
9. Herrera, C., Kauh, T.J., Cooney, S.M., Grossman, J.B., & McMaken, J. (2008). High School Students as Mentors: Findings from the Big Brothers Big Sisters School-Based Mentoring Impact Study. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.
10. Ibn Sina, Abu Ali (11th century). Kitab ash-Shifa. (Uzbek translation: Tashkent: Fan, 1980).
11. Kim, J., & Park, S. (2021). Flipped Mentoring in Higher Education: A Case Study from South Korea. Asia-Pacific Journal of Education, 41(2), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1798477
12. Kram, K.E. (1983). Phases of the Mentor Relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 608–625. https://doi.org/10.2307/255910
13. Kram, K.E. (1985). Mentoring at Work: Developmental Relationships in Organizational Life. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
14. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Rollag, K. (2010). Teaching Business Cases Online Through Discussion Boards: Strategies and Best Practices. Journal of Management Education, 34(4), 499–526.
16. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.
17. Single, P.B., & Muller, C.B. (1999). Electronic Mentoring: Issues to Advance Research and Practice. Paper presented at the International Mentoring Association Conference, Atlanta, GA.
18. UNESCO (2020). Education: From Disruption to Recovery. Paris: UNESCO. https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse
19. van der Krogt, F. (2020). Peer Mentoring in the Digital Age: Lessons from Delft University of Technology. European Journal of Engineering Education, 45(5), 756–771.
20. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V.I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic Review of Research on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Higher Education—Where Are the Educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
