Filologiyaning dolzarb masalalari

Mazkur anjuman Oliy ta’lim, fan va innovatsiyalar vazirligining 2026-yil 16-yanvardagi 11-sonli buyrug‘i bilan 2026-yilda xalqaro va respublika miqyosida o‘tkaziladigan ilmiy va ilmiy-texnik tadbirlar rejasiga kiritilgan bo'lib, Qo‘qon davlat universiteti O‘zbek tili va adabiyoti kafedrasi tomonidan 2026-yil 13-14-oktabr kunlari o'tkazilgan.

1+ Выпуски
277+ Статьи
285+ Участники
Oʻzbekcha

GRAMMATIKALASHUVDAGI KONTEKSTUAL QAYTA TALQIN: METONIMIK VA METAFORIK MEXANIZMLAR

Дата публикации
14.10.2026
Журнал
Filologiyaning dolzarb masalalari
Выпуск
“Filologiyaning dolzarb masalalari” mavzusidagi respublika ilmiy-amaliy anjumani
Страницы
1277-1283
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.24101572

Авторы

Аннотация

Maqolada grammatikalashuvda kontekstga bog‘liq qayta talqinning metonimik va metaforik mexanizmlar bilan aloqasi hamda turli tillardagi ko‘rinishlari tahlil qilinadi.

Ключевые слова

grammatikalashuv kontekstual qayta talqin metonimiya metafora grammatik metonimiya pragmatik inferensiya qiyosiy tahlil

Версии на других языках

Русский
В статье анализируется контекстуальная реконструкция значения в грамматикализации и соотношение метонимических и метафорических механизмов на материале разных языков
грамматикализация контекстуальная переинтерпретация метонимия метафора грамматическая метонимия прагматическое выведение смысла сопоставительный анализ
English
The article examines context-induced reinterpretation in grammaticalization and distinguishes metonymic and metaphoric mechanisms using cross-linguistic data.
grammaticalization context-induced reinterpretation metonymy metaphor grammatical metonymy pragmatic inferencing cross-linguistic analysis

Список литературы

1. Heine, B., Claudi, U., & Hünnemeyer, F. (1991). Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. University of Chicago Press.
2. Heine, B., Claudi, U., & Hünnemeyer, F. (1991). From cognition to grammar: Evidence from African languages. In E. C. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization: Volume I. Theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 149–188). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.1.09hei
3. Heine, B. (2002). On the role of context in grammaticalization. In I. Wischer & G. Diewald (Eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization (pp. 83–101). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.49.08hei
4. Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C. (2003). Grammaticalization (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
5. Herring, S. C. (1991). The grammaticalization of rhetorical questions in Tamil. In E. C. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization: Volume I. Theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 253–284). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.1.12her
6. Hilpert, M. (2007). Chained metonymies in lexicon and grammar: A cross-linguistic perspective on body-part terms. In G. Radden, K.-M. Köpcke, T. Berg, & P. Siemund (Eds.), Aspects of meaning construction (pp. 77–98). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.136.07hil
7. Panther, K.-U., Thornburg, L. L., & Barcelona, A. (Eds.). (2009). Metonymy and metaphor in grammar. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.25
8. Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1999). Towards a theory of metonymy. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 17–59). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.4.03rad
9. Traugott, E. C., & Dasher, R. B. (2002). Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge University Press.
10. Wu, J., & Dai, Z. (2026). Revisiting the grammaticalization of future be going to: A corpus-based approach. PLoS ONE, 21(7), e0352674. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0352674
11. Eckardt, R. (2006). What is going to happen. In Meaning change in grammaticalization: An enquiry into semantic reanalysis (pp. 91–127). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199262601.003.0004
12. Campbell, L. (1991). Some grammaticalization changes in Estonian and their implications. In E. C. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization: Volume I. Theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 285–300). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.1.13cam
13. Kraska-Szlenk, I. (2014). Semantic extensions of body part terms: Common patterns and their interpretation. Language Sciences, 44, 15–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.02.002
14. Ziegeler, D., & Lee, S. (2009). A metonymic analysis of Singaporean and Malaysian English causative constructions. In K.-U. Panther, L. L. Thornburg, & A. Barcelona (Eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (pp. 291–322). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.25.18zie
15. Wu, S., & Zhang, S. (2014). On the cross-linguistic study of grammatical metonymy. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 14(9), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2014.09.004