DEVELOPING PROFESSIONAL SPEAKING SKILLS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE STUDENTS THROUGH DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES
Дата публикации
23.06.2026
Журнал
Концептуальные основы фундаментальных, прикладных и инновационных исследований в трансформации педагогического образования и воспитания
Выпуск
Сборник материалов международной научно-практической конференции на тему: «Концептуальные основы фундаментальных, прикладных и инновационных исследований в трансформации педагогического образования и воспитания»
Страницы
1094-1098
Авторы
Аннотация
The paper presents a methodology for developing the English professional speaking skills of environmental science students on the basis of digital educational technologies. The methodology rests on three design decisions: the unit of content selection is a professional spoken genre rather than a topic; digital tools are classified by the didactic function they perform (information-source, production-communication, monitoring-analysis) rather than by their technical type; and assessment is distributed across several sources within a six-criterion analytic rubric protected by a content-accuracy rule.
Ключевые слова
CEFR
English for Specific Purposes
analytic rubric
asynchronous video response
digital linguodidactics
environmental science
genre analysis
mediation
professional speaking skills
Список литературы
1. Hutchinson T., Waters A. English for Specific Purposes: A Learning-Centred Approach. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. – 183 p.
2. Dudley-Evans T., St John M. J. Developments in English for Specific Purposes: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. – 301 p.
3. Swales J. M. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. – 260 p.
4. Coyle D., Hood P., Marsh D. CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. – 173 p.
5. Swain M. The output hypothesis: Theory and research // Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning. – Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2005. – P. 471–483.
6. MacIntyre P. D., Clément R., Dörnyei Z., Noels K. A. Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2 // The Modern Language Journal. – 1998. – Vol. 82, No. 4. – P. 545–562.
7. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. Companion Volume. – Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 2020. – 278 p.
8. Puentedura R. R. SAMR: Moving from Enhancement to Transformation. – Hippasus, 2013. – URL: http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/
9. Mishra P., Koehler M. J. Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge // Teachers College Record. – 2006. – Vol. 108, No. 6. – P. 1017–1054.
10. Coxhead A. A new academic word list // TESOL Quarterly. – 2000. – Vol. 34, No. 2. – P. 213–238.
11. Vygotsky L. S. Mind in Society. – Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978. – 159 p.
12. Jalolov J. J. Chet til oʻqitish metodikasi. – Toshkent: Oʻqituvchi, 2012. – 432 b.