Oʻzbekcha
AEROBIK REABILITATSIYANING QAYTA MIOKARD INFARKTI VA GOSPITALIZATSIYA XAVFIGA TA’SIRI
Jurnal
Pedagogik ta’lim va tarbiya transformatsiyasida fundamental, amaliy va innovatsion tadqiqotlarning konseptual asoslari
Nashr
Pedagogik ta’lim va tarbiya transformatsiyasida fundamental, amaliy va innovatsion tadqiqotlarning konseptual asoslari xalqaro ilmiy-amaliy anjuman (2026-yil, 23-iyun)
Annotatsiya
Ushbu maqolada miokard infarktidan keyingi bemorlarda aerobik reabilitatsiyaning qayta miokard infarkti va gospitalizatsiya xavfiga ta’siri tahlil qilindi. Tadqiqotda zamonaviy klinik yo‘riqnomalar, sistematik sharhlar, meta-tahlillar va randomizatsiyalangan tadqiqotlar asosida aerobik mashqlarga asoslangan kardioreabilitatsiyaning klinik samaradorligi baholandi. Adabiyotlar tahlili shuni ko‘rsatdiki, miokard infarktidan keyin muntazam va individual tanlangan aerobik reabilitatsiya bemorlarning funksional holatini yaxshilaydi, jismoniy yuklamaga chidamliligini oshiradi, yurak-qon tomir xavf omillarini kamaytiradi hamda qayta gospitalizatsiya ehtimolini pasaytiradi. Shuningdek, kompleks kardioreabilitatsiya dasturi tarkibida aerobik mashqlarning qo‘llanilishi qayta miokard infarkti xavfini kamaytirishda muhim ahamiyatga ega. Aerobik reabilitatsiya samarasi mashq intensivligi, davomiyligi, bemorning klinik holati va dori terapiyasiga rioya qilish darajasiga bog‘liq. Maqolada aerobik reabilitatsiyaning asosiy mexanizmlari, xavfsizlik jihatlari va klinik amaliyotdagi ahamiyati yoritilgan.
Kalit so‘zlar
aerobik reabilitatsiya
gospitalizatsiya
ikkilamchi profilaktika
kardioreabilitatsiya
miokard infarkti
qayta miokard infarkti
Русский
This article analyzes the effect of aerobic rehabilitation on the risk of recurrent myocardial infarction and hospitalization in patients after myocardial infarction. The clinical effectiveness of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation was evaluated based on current clinical guidelines, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized studies. Literature analysis showed that regular and individually prescribed aerobic rehabilitation after myocardial infarction improves patients’ functional status, increases exercise tolerance, reduces cardiovascular risk factors, and decreases the likelihood of rehospitalization. In addition, aerobic exercise as part of a comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation program plays an important role in reducing the risk of recurrent myocardial infarction. The effectiveness of aerobic rehabilitation depends on exercise intensity and duration, the patient’s clinical status, and adherence to pharmacological therapy. The article discusses the main mechanisms of aerobic rehabilitation, safety aspects, and its importance in clinical practice
aerobic rehabilitation
cardiac rehabilitation
hospitalization
myocardial infarction
recurrent myocardial infarction
secondary prevention
English
This article analyzes the effect of aerobic rehabilitation on the risk of recurrent myocardial infarction and hospitalization in patients after myocardial infarction. The clinical effectiveness of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation was evaluated based on current clinical guidelines, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized studies. Literature analysis showed that regular and individually prescribed aerobic rehabilitation after myocardial infarction improves patients’ functional status, increases exercise tolerance, reduces cardiovascular risk factors, and decreases the likelihood of rehospitalization. In addition, aerobic exercise as part of a comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation program plays an important role in reducing the risk of recurrent myocardial infarction. The effectiveness of aerobic rehabilitation depends on exercise intensity and duration, the patient’s clinical status, and adherence to pharmacological therapy. The article discusses the main mechanisms of aerobic rehabilitation, safety aspects, and its importance in clinical practice
aerobic rehabilitation
cardiac rehabilitation
hospitalization
myocardial infarction
recurrent myocardial infarction
secondary prevention
1. Visseren F.L.J., Mach F., Smulders Y.M., et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. European Heart Journal. 2021;42(34):3227–3337. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484.
2. Pelliccia A., Sharma S., Gati S., et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines on sports cardiology and exercise in patients with cardiovascular disease. European Heart Journal. 2021;42(1):17–96. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa605.
3. Vrints C., Andreotti F., Koskinas K.C., et al. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes. European Heart Journal. 2024;45(36):3415–3537. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae177.
4. Dibben G.O., Faulkner J., Oldridge N., Rees K., Thompson D.R., Zwisler A.D., Taylor R.S. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis. European Heart Journal. 2023;44(6):452–469. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac747.
5. Dibben G., Faulkner J., Oldridge N., Rees K., Thompson D.R., Zwisler A.D., Taylor R.S. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2021;11:CD001800. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub4.
6. Ambrosetti M., Abreu A., Corrà U., Davos C.H., Hansen D., Frederix I., et al. Secondary prevention through comprehensive cardiovascular rehabilitation: from knowledge to implementation. 2020 update. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology. 2021;28(5):460–495. DOI: 10.1177/2047487320913379.
7. Santiago de Araújo Pio C., Marzolini S., Pakosh M., Grace S.L. Effect of cardiac rehabilitation dose on mortality and morbidity: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2017;92(11):1644–1659. DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.07.019.
8. Salzwedel A., Jensen K., Rauch B., Doherty P., Metzendorf M.I., Hackbusch M., et al. Effectiveness of comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation in coronary artery disease patients treated according to contemporary evidence-based medicine: update of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcome Study (CROS-II). European Journal of Preventive Cardiology. 2020;27(16):1756–1774. DOI: 10.1177/2047487320905719.
9. Hansen D., Abreu A., Ambrosetti M., Cornelissen V., Gevaert A., Kemps H., et al. Exercise intensity assessment and prescription in cardiovascular rehabilitation and beyond: why and how. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology. 2022;29(1):230–245. DOI: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwab007.
10. Gomes-Neto M., Durães A.R., Reis H.F.C., Neves V.R., Martinez B.P., Carvalho V.O. High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology. 2017;24(16):1696–1707. DOI: 10.1177/2047487317728370.
11. Santiago de Araújo Pio C., Chaves G.S.S., Davies P., Taylor R.S., Grace S.L. Interventions to promote patient utilisation of cardiac rehabilitation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2019;2:CD007131. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007131.pub4.
12. Anderson L., Sharp G.A., Norton R.J., Dalal H., Dean S.G., Jolly K., et al. Home-based versus centre-based cardiac rehabilitation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017;6:CD007130. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007130.pub4.
13. Jin K., Khonsari S., Gallagher R., Gallagher P., Clark A.M., Freedman B., et al. Telehealth interventions for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2019;18(4):260–271. DOI: 10.1177/1474515119826510.
14. Abell B., Glasziou P., Hoffmann T. The contribution of individual exercise training components to clinical outcomes in randomised controlled trials of cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-regression. Sports Medicine Open. 2017;3:19. DOI: 10.1186/s40798-017-0086-z.
15. Piepoli M.F., Corrà U., Dendale P., Frederix I., Prescott E., Schmid J.P., et al. Challenges in secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction: a call for action. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology. 2016;23(18):1994–2006. DOI: 10.1177/2047487316663873.
