English
PEDAGOGICAL CONDITIONS FOR IMPLEMENTING THE ADAPTIVE–INTEGRATIVE APPROACH IN TEACHING MATHEMATICS TO CHEMISTRY STUDENTS
Journal
Conceptual foundations of fundamental, applied, and innovative research in the transformation of pedagogical education and upbringing
Issue
Proceedings of the international scientific and practical conference on “Conceptual foundations of fundamental, applied, and innovative research in the transformation of pedagogical education and upbringing”
Abstract
This article presents a scholarly analysis of the pedagogical conditions required for implementing the adaptive–integrative approach in teaching mathematics to chemistry students. On the basis of a structured review of international peer-reviewed literature, five necessary pedagogical conditions are identified: institutional and organisational support for interdisciplinary cooperation; sustained, content-specific professional development of faculty; curricular alignment between the mathematics and chemistry components of the programme; the systematic use of student-centred, context-based and modelling-oriented didactic methods; and formative, competence-oriented assessment with timely feedback. The interdependence of the conditions is substantiated, and practical recommendations together with testable propositions for subsequent implementation research are proposed.
Keywords
adaptive–integrative approach
curricular alignment.
formative assessment
interdisciplinary teaching
mathematical modelling
mathematics for chemists
pedagogical conditions
professional development
Oʻzbekcha
Mazkur maqolada kimyo yo‘nalishi talabalariga matematikani o‘qitishda adaptiv-integrativ yondashuvni amaliyotga joriy etishning pedagogik shart-sharoitlari ilmiy tahlil qilinadi. Xalqaro ilmiy adabiyotlarning tizimli tahlili asosida besh zaruriy pedagogik shart aniqlangan: fanlararo hamkorlikni institutsional qo‘llab-quvvatlash; professor-o‘qituvchilarning uzluksiz, mazmunga yo‘naltirilgan kasbiy rivojlanishi; matematika va kimyo o‘quv dasturlarining o‘zaro muvofiqlashtirilishi; talabaga yo‘naltirilgan, kontekstga asoslangan va modellashtirishga tayanuvchi didaktik metodlardan foydalanish; shakllantiruvchi, kompetensiyaga yo‘naltirilgan baholash va o‘z vaqtida fikr-mulohaza berish. Shartlarning o‘zaro bog‘liqligi asoslanib, ularni amaliyotga joriy etish bo‘yicha amaliy tavsiyalar va keyingi tadqiqotlar uchun tekshiriladigan farazlar taklif etilgan.
adaptiv-integrativ yondashuv
kasbiy rivojlanish
kimyogarlar uchun matematika
modellashtirish
o‘quv dasturlarini muvofiqlashtirish.
pedagogik shart-sharoitlar
shakllantiruvchi baholash
Русский
В статье проводится научный анализ педагогических условий внедрения адаптивно-интегративного подхода к обучению математике студентов-химиков. На основе систематического анализа международной научной литературы выявлены пять необходимых педагогических условий: институциональная поддержка междисциплинарного сотрудничества; непрерывное, содержательно-ориентированное профессиональное развитие преподавателей; согласование учебных программ по математике и химии; применение студентоцентрированных, контекстных и моделирующих дидактических методов; формирующее, компетентностно-ориентированное оценивание со своевременной обратной связью. Обоснована взаимозависимость условий, предложены практические рекомендации по их реализации и проверяемые гипотезы для последующих эмпирических исследований.
адаптивно-интегративный подход
математика для химиков
междисциплинарное обучение
моделирование
педагогические условия
профессиональное развитие
согласование учебных программ.
формирующее оценивание
1. Mahaffy P., Matlin S.A., Holme T.A., MacKellar J. Mathematics matters or maybe not: an astonishing independence between mathematics and the rate of learning in general chemistry // JACS Au. – 2024. – Vol. 4, No. 8. – P. 2890–2904. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.4c01126
2. Parsons S., Dingwall S., Reid K. Introduction to contextual maths in chemistry. – London: Royal Society of Chemistry, 2020.
3. Stohlmann M., Moore T.J., Roehrig G.H. Considerations for teaching integrated STEM education // Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research. – 2012. – Vol. 2, No. 1. – P. 28–34. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314653
4. Margot K.C., Kettler T. Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review // International Journal of STEM Education. – 2019. – Vol. 6, No. 1. – Art. 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2
5. Tomkin J.H., Beilstein S.O., Morphew J.W., Herman G.L. Evidence that communities of practice are associated with active learning in large STEM lectures // International Journal of STEM Education. – 2019. – Vol. 6, No. 1. – Art. 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0154-z
6. Morris R., Perry T., Wardle L. Formative assessment and feedback for learning in higher education: a systematic review // Review of Education. – 2021. – Vol. 9, No. 3. – e3292. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3292
7. Rodriguez J.-M.G., Hunter K.H., Scharlott L.J., Becker N.M. How much is just maths? Investigating problem solving in chemical kinetics at the interface of chemistry and mathematics through the development of an extended mathematical modelling cycle // Chemistry Education Research and Practice. – 2024. – Vol. 25, No. 1. – P. 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3RP00168G
8. Bennett J., Lubben F., Hogarth S. Bringing science to life: a synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context-based and STS approaches to science teaching // Science Education. – 2007. – Vol. 91, No. 3. – P. 347–370. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20186
