Historical and Contemporary Trends in the Philosophy of Education: Education, Knowledge, and Methodologies

This Republican Scientific and Practical Conference was held on May 20, 2026, at the initiative of the Department of Philosophy and History of Namangan State Pedagogical Institute, in accordance with the 2026 Plan of International Scientific and Scientific-Technical Events, approved by Appendix No. 1 to Order No. 11 of the Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Innovation of the Republic of Uzbekistan, dated January 16, 2026.

1+ Issues
123+ Articles
126+ Participants
Oʻzbekcha

FIZIKA TA’LIMIDA KONTEKSTLILIK VA ABSTRAKT FIZIK BILIMLAR INTEGRATSIYASINING METODIK ASOSLARI

Published
20.05.2026
Journal
Historical and Contemporary Trends in the Philosophy of Education: Education, Knowledge, and Methodologies
Issue
Ta'lim falsafasida tarixiylik va zamonaviylik tendensiyalari: ta'lim, bilim, metodlar
Pages
876-883
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.22992806

Authors

Abstract

Tezisda fizika ta’limida kontekstlilik va abstrakt fizik bilimlar integratsiyasining metodik asoslari tahlil qilingan. Kontekst, abstraksiyalash va bilim transferining didaktik funksiyalari aniqlashtirilib, fizik bilimlarni yangi vaziyatlarda qo‘llashga yo‘naltirilgan “kontekst–abstraksiya–transfer” metodik mexanizmi taklif etilgan.

Keywords

abstraksiyalash abstrakt fizik bilim bilim transferi fizik model kontekstlilik metodik mexanizm

Other language versions

Русский

МЕТОДИЧЕСКИЕ ОСНОВЫ ИНТЕГРАЦИИ КОНТЕКСТНОСТИ И АБСТРАКТНЫХ ФИЗИЧЕСКИХ ЗНАНИЙ В ОБУЧЕНИИ ФИЗИКЕ

В тезисе проанализированы методические основы интеграции контекстности и абстрактных физических знаний в обучении физике. Уточнены дидактические функции контекста, абстрагирования и переноса знаний, предложен методический механизм «контекст–абстракция–трансфер», направленный на применение физических знаний в новых ситуациях.
абстрагирование абстрактные физические знания контекстность методический механизм обучение физике перенос знаний физическая модель
English

METHODOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS FOR THE INTEGRATION OF CONTEXTUALIZATION AND ABSTRACT PHYSICS KNOWLEDGE IN PHYSICS EDUCATION

The paper examines the methodological foundations for integrating contextualization and abstract physics knowledge in physics education. The didactic functions of context, abstraction, and knowledge transfer are clarified, and a “context–abstraction–transfer” methodological mechanism is proposed to support the application of physics knowledge in new situations.
abstract physics knowledge abstraction knowledge transfer methodological mechanism physical model

References

1. Bennett, J., Lubben, F., & Hogarth, S. (2007). Bringing science to life: A synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context-based and STS approaches to science teaching. Science Education, 91(3), 347–370. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20186
2. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032
3. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5(2), 121–152. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2
4. de Putter-Smits, L. G. A., Taconis, R., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2013). Mapping context-based learning environments: The construction of an instrument. Learning Environments Research, 16, 437–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-013-9143-9
5. Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., & Thompson, L. (2003). Learning and transfer: A general role for analogical encoding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.393
6. Gilbert, J. K. (2006). On the nature of “context” in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 957–976. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600702470
7. Greeno, J. G. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.1.5
8. Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1998). How seductive details do their damage: A theory of cognitive interest in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 414–434. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.3.414
9. Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2000). A typology of school science models. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 1011–1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900416884
10. Taasoobshirazi, G., & Carr, M. (2008). A review and critique of context-based physics instruction and assessment. Educational Research Review, 3(2), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2008.01.002
11. To‘raxonov, F. B. (2021). Fizik jarayonlarni kompyuterda modellashtirishning metodik asoslari. Pedagogik mahorat, (6), 105–109.
12. To‘raxonov, F. B. (2022). Ixtisoslashgan maktablarda fizikaviy jarayonlarni modellashtirish imkoniyatini beruvchi dasturiy ta’minotlar tahlili. Ta’lim va innovatsion tadqiqotlar, (2), 174–178. https://doi.org/10.53885/edinres.2022.72.72.027
13. Kurbanov, M., & To‘raxonov, F. B. (2023). Fizika o‘qitishda zamonaviy namoyish tajribalarga qo‘yilgan talablar. Educational Research in Universal Sciences, 2(17 Special), 35–39.
14. To‘raxonov, F. B., & Omonqulova, U. H. (2024). Fizikani namoyish tajribalar yordamida takomillashtirishning metodik asoslari. Educational Research in Universal Sciences, 3(4 Special), 323–329. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10652865
15. To‘raxonov, F. B., & Omonqulova, U. H. (2024). Fizika fanini real va virtual namoyish tajribalar asosida o‘qitish. Educational Research in Universal Sciences, 3(13), 110–117. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14564101
View PDF Related articles