Oʻzbekcha
ILMIY MAQOLA ANNOTATSIYASINING JAHON, MDH VA O‘ZBEK TILSHUNOSLIGIDA O‘RGANILISHI
Jurnal
Zamonaviy fan: innovatsion yondashuvlar va yosh tadqiqotchilarning dolzarb izlanishlari
Nashr
Zamonaviy fan: innovatsion yondashuvlar va yosh tadqiqotchilarning dolzarb izlanishlari
Annotatsiya
Maqolada ilmiy maqola annotatsiyasining alohida janr sifatida jahon, MDH va o‘zbek tilshunosligida o‘rganilish holati qiyosiy-tahliliy nuqtai nazardan ko‘rib chiqiladi. Tadqiqotning asosiy e’tibori annotatsiyada axborotni strukturalash (retorik move-tuzilma) hamda mualliflik identifikatsiyasining (muallif ovozi, o‘zlik-ifoda) ifodalanishiga qaratilgan. Mavjud adabiyotlar tahlili asosida o‘zbek tilshunosligida ushbu masalaning qiyosiy va korpusga asoslangan tarzda yetarlicha o‘rganilmaganligi dolzarb ilmiy bo‘shliq sifatida asoslanadi
Kalit so‘zlar
ilmiy annotatsiya
janr tahlili
korpus lingvistikasi
metadiskurs
mualliflik identifikatsiyasi
qiyosiy tilshunoslik
retorik move-struktura
Русский
В статье в сравнительно-аналитическом аспекте рассматривается степень изученности аннотации научной статьи как особого жанра в мировом, СНГ-овском и узбекском языкознании. Основное внимание уделено структурированию информации (риторическая move-структура) и выражению авторской идентификации (авторский голос, самоупоминание) в аннотации. На основе анализа имеющейся литературы обосновывается актуальный научный пробел — недостаточная сравнительная и корпусная изученность данного вопроса в узбекском языкознании
авторская идентификация
жанровый анализ
корпусная лингвистика
метадискурс
научная аннотация
риторическая move-структура
сопоставительное языкознание
English
The article provides a comparative-analytical review of how the research article abstract, as a distinct genre, has been studied in world, CIS and Uzbek linguistics. The focus is placed on the structuring of information (rhetorical move structure) and the expression of authorial identity (authorial voice, self-mention) in the abstract. Based on a review of the existing literature, the study substantiates a relevant research gap: the insufficient comparative and corpus-based study of this issue in Uzbek linguistics
authorial identity
contrastive linguistics
corpus linguistics
genre analysis
metadiscourse
research article abstract
rhetorical move structure
1. Bhatia V.K. Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. – London: Longman, 1993. – 246 p.
2. Eshchanova M. Classical classifications of euphemisms: semantic, pragmatic and functional approaches // O‘zbekiston–2030: innovatsiya, fan va ta’lim istiqbollari. IV Respublika ilmiy-amaliy konferensiyasi materiallari. – 2025. – № 1.4. – B. 113–115.
3. Hakimov M. O‘zbek ilmiy matnining sintagmatik va pragmatik xususiyatlari: Filologiya fanlari doktori diss. – Toshkent, 2001. – 262 b.
4. Hyland K. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. – London: Longman, 2000. – 211 p.
5. Hyland K. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. – London: Continuum, 2005. – 230 p.
6. Lorés R. On R.A. abstracts: from rhetorical structure to thematic organisation // English for Specific Purposes. – 2004. – Vol. 23, No. 3. – P. 280–302.
7. Mamatov A.E. Zamonaviy lingvistika. – Toshkent: Tafakkur avlodi, 2020. – 168 b.
8. Martín-Martín P. A genre analysis of English and Spanish research paper abstracts in experimental social sciences // English for Specific Purposes. – 2003. – Vol. 22, No. 1. – P. 25–43.
9. Muhamedova S., Saparniyozova M. Matn lingvistikasi. – Toshkent, 2011. – 120 b.
10. Norbayeva Sh. Xorazm shevalaridagi ayrim eskirgan so‘zlar tahlili // Conferences. – 2025. – Vol. 1, № 1.
11. Norbayeva Sh. Xorazm shevalari leksikasida substrat asosli birliklar // Conferences. – 2026. – Vol. 1, № 1.
12. Pho P.D. Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and educational technology: a study of linguistic realizations of rhetorical structure and authorial stance // Discourse Studies. – 2008. – Vol. 10, No. 2. – P. 231–250.
13. Radjapova I.E. Tarjimada badiiy tasvir vositalarini qayta yaratish muammolari // O‘zbekiston davlat jahon tillari universiteti konferensiyalari. – 2025. – B. 736–738.
14. Salager-Meyer F. A text-type and move analysis study of verb tense and modality distribution in medical English abstracts // English for Specific Purposes. – 1992. – Vol. 11, No. 2. – P. 93–113.
15. Santos M.B.D. The textual organization of research paper abstracts in applied linguistics // Text. – 1996. – Vol. 16, No. 4. – P. 481–499.
16. Swales J.M. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. – 260 p.
17. Vassileva I. Who is the Author? A Contrastive Analysis of Authorial Presence in English, German, French, Russian and Bulgarian Academic Discourse. – Sankt Augustin: Asgard, 2000. – 261 p.
18. Ventola E. Abstracts as an Object of Linguistic Study // Writing vs Speaking: Language, Text, Discourse, Communication. – Tübingen: Gunter Narr, 1994. – P. 333–352.
19. Вейзе А.А. Чтение, реферирование и аннотирование иностранного текста. – Москва: Высшая школа, 1985. – 127 с.
20. Кожина М.Н. Стилистика русского языка. – Москва: Просвещение, 1993. – 224 с.
21. Котюрова М.П. Стилистика научной речи. – Москва: Академия, 2010. – 240 с.
22. Чернявская В.Е. Интерпретация научного текста. – Москва: Издательство ЛКИ, 2007. – 128 с.
