FROM REACTIVE MONITORING TO PREDICTIVE GOVERNANCE: A DATA-DRIVEN EARLY-WARNING MODEL FOR MANAGING STUDENT INTERNSHIP RISK IN HIGHER EDUCATION
Nashr sanasi
23.06.2026
Jurnal
Pedagogik ta’lim va tarbiya transformatsiyasida fundamental, amaliy va innovatsion tadqiqotlarning konseptual asoslari
Nashr
Pedagogik ta’lim va tarbiya transformatsiyasida fundamental, amaliy va innovatsion tadqiqotlarning konseptual asoslari xalqaro ilmiy-amaliy anjuman (2026-yil, 23-iyun)
Sahifalar
78-85
Mualliflar
Annotatsiya
Although the digitalization of internship management in higher education has advanced considerably, most existing systems remain reactive: they record what has already happened rather than anticipate where the process is likely to fail. This study reframes internship governance as a predictive task and proposes a four-layer early-warning model that converts routinely collected supervision data into forward-looking risk signals. Drawing on a conceptual-analytical methodology combined with expert appraisal, the model integrates a data layer, a feature layer, a machine-learning risk-scoring layer, and a tiered action layer that triggers graduated mentor responses. Comparative expert assessment indicates that a predictive configuration substantially outperforms the conventional reactive approach in the timeliness of risk detection, the prevention of internship dropout, and the objectivity of assessment. The findings suggest that shifting the locus of management from documentation toward anticipation can measurably improve both the continuity and the quality of professional practice. The proposed model offers a transferable framework for higher education institutions seeking to embed analytics-based decision-making into internship policy.
Kalit so‘zlar
machine learning
internship governance
predictive analytics
early-warning system
risk scoring
higher education
mentoring
professional practice.
Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar
References
1. Akbarov, B. S. (2024). Organizational and legal basis of the processes of organizing and conducting continuous professional practice of students. Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientific Research in Natural and Social Sciences, Toronto, 166–170.
2. Akbarov, B. S. (2024). Theoretical analysis of the management of the processes of organizing and conducting continuous professional practice of students. Western European Journal of Modern Experiments and Scientific Methods, 2(7), 1–4.
3. Akbarov, B. S. (2025). Digitalization of internship processes and ways of improving their management. Tadqiqotlar, 64(1), 311–314.
4. Astin, A. W. (1999). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 40(5), 518–529.
5. Deschaine, M. E., & Jankens, B. P. (2017). Creating successful and sustainable educational administrative internship experiences. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 7(1), 5–20.
6. Kroon, N., & Franco, M. (2022). Antecedents, processes and outcomes of an internship program: An employer's perspective. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 14(2), 556–574.
7. Narayanan, V. K., Olk, P. M., & Fukami, C. V. (2010). Determinants of internship effectiveness: An exploratory model. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(1), 61–80.
8. Nicho, M. et al. (2024). A strategic evaluation of educational continuity for accessibility during uncertainty in an educational practicum. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 20(1), 1–31.
9. OECD. (2019). Education at a glance 2019: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing.
10. Selznick, P. (1996). Institutionalism “old” and “new”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(2), 270–277.