TPACK-КОМПЕТЕНТНОСТЬ ПРЕПОДАВАТЕЛЕЙ АНГЛИЙСКОГО ЯЗЫКА КАК ИНОСТРАННОГО В ОБУЧЕНИИ ПИСЬМЕННОЙ РЕЧИ
Published
20.05.2026
Journal
Historical and Contemporary Trends in the Philosophy of Education: Education, Knowledge, and Methodologies
Issue
Ta'lim falsafasida tarixiylik va zamonaviylik tendensiyalari: ta'lim, bilim, metodlar
Pages
1041-1052
Authors
Abstract
В статье рассматриваются методические подходы к развитию и совершенствованию письменной компетенции студентов на английском языке на основе модели TPACK. Особое внимание уделяется интеграции технологических, педагогических и предметных знаний в процесс обучения письменной речи. Раскрывается значение цифровых технологий и технологической компетентности преподавателя в повышении эффективности обучения письменной коммуникации.
Keywords
EFL
TPACK
английский язык
методика обучения.
письменная компетенция
письменная речь
технологическая компетентность
цифровые технологии
References
1. Ali S. M., Hasanah N. Using Problem-Based Learning (PBL) in Improving Writing Skill at Boarding School // International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding. 2024. Vol. 11, No. 1. P. 212–221.
2. Hidayati H. Teaching writing to EFL learners: An investigation of challenges confronted by Indonesian teachers // Langkawi: Journal of the Association for Arabic and English. – 2018. – Vol. 4, No. 1. – P. 1. – DOI: 10.31332/lkw.v4i1.772.
3. Graham S., Rijlaarsdam G. Writing education around the globe: Introduction and call for a new global analysis // Reading and Writing. – 2016. – Vol. 29, No. 5. – P. 781–792. – DOI: 10.1007/s11145-016-9640-1.
4. Kitchakarn O. Using blogs to improve students’ summary writing abilities // Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education. – 2012. – Vol. 13, No. 4. – P. 209–219.
5. Akinwamide T. K. The influence of process approach on English as second language students’ performances in essay writing // English Language Teaching. – 2012. – Vol. 5, No. 3. – DOI: 10.5539/elt.v5n3p16.
6. Ho N., Thuy H. Teaching EFL writing in Vietnam: Problems and solutions – A discussion from the outlook of applied linguistics // VNU Journal of Science: Foreign Languages. – 2009. – Vol. 25. – P. 61–66.
7. Mozaheb M. A., Seifoori Z., Beigi A. B. Effective Iranian EFL writing teachers: A technology-based framework // Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. – 2013. – Vol. 70. – P. 18–27. – DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.034.
8. Fu J., Wang Y. Inspecting EFL teachers’ academic literacy development in multilingual contexts: A global vision // Heliyon. – 2022. – Vol. 8. – Article e12143. – DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12143.
9. Muresan L. M., Orna-Montesinos C. Academic literacy development: What does it entail for multilingual scholars? // Academic Literacy Development: Perspectives on Multilingual Scholars’ Approaches to Writing. – Cham: Springer, 2021. – DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-62877-2_1.
10. Li D. A review of academic literacy research development: From 2002 to 2019 // Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education. – 2022. – Vol. 7. – Article 1. – DOI: 10.1186/s40862-022-00130-z.
11. Alabere R. A., Shapii A. The effects of process-genre approach on academic writing // JEES (Journal of English Educators Society). – 2019. – Vol. 4, No. 2. – DOI: 10.21070/jees.v4i2.2598.
12. P. Mishra, M.J. Koehler, Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge, Teach. Coll. Rec. 108 (6) (2006) 1017–1054, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x.
13. L. Shulman, Knowledge and teaching:foundations of the new reform, Harv. Educ. Rev. 57 (1) (1987) 1–23, https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1. j463w79r56455411.
14. Arican, S., & Mutlu, Ş. (2023). 21st-Century Learning Skills and School Climate Levels of Anatolian Imam Hatip High School Students. Ankara Universitesi Ilahiyat Fakultesi Dergisi, 64(2), 699–742.
15. Budianto, L. et al. (2023). The TPACK level of in-service EFL teacher online professional training: The perspectives of teachers, students, and trainers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 39(2), 87–101.
16. Сарсенбаева З. Analysis of images and symbols in english non-realistic works //Ренессанс в парадигме новаций образования и технологий в XXI веке. – 2023. – Т. 1. – №. 1. – С. 229-232.
17. Сарсенбаева З. Модернизм в узбекской литературе и интерпретация образов //Зарубежная лингвистика и лингводидактика. – 2024. – Т. 2. – №. 1. – С. 193-199.
18. Zoya S. LITERARY ANALYSIS OF DAVID MITCHELL’S WORKS IN ENGLISH LITERATURE //Talqin va tadqiqotlar ilmiy-uslubiy jurnali. – 2024. – Т. 2. – №. 41. – С. 11-19.
19. Zoya S. LITERARY ANALYSIS OF ULUGBEK HAMDAMOV’S WORKS IN UZBEK LITERATURE //Talqin va tadqiqotlar ilmiy-uslubiy jurnali. – 2024. – Т. 2. – №. 41. – С. 20-25.
20. Sаrsеnbаеvа Z. MODERN APPROACHES TO TEACHING LITERARY TERMS IN COMPARATIVE LITERATURE //Mental Enlightenment Scientific-Methodological Journal. – 2026. – Т. 7. – №. 02. – С. 198-209.
21. Belgibayeva G., Sarsenbaeva Z., Zhumagulova K. MAG ‘JAN JUMABAYEV IJODIDA OZODLIK G ‘OYASI //Ijtimoiy-gumanitar sohada ilmiy-innovatsion tadqiqotlar. – 2026. – Т. 3. – №. 1. – С. 159-165.
22. Sarsenbayeva Z., Zillolova G. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO TRANSLATED VERSIONS OF A LITERARY TEXT //Ijtimoiy-gumanitar sohada ilmiy-innovatsion tadqiqotlar. – 2025. – Т. 2. – №. 4. – С. 183-188.
23. Galich, A., Nazarets, V., & Vasiliev, E. Theory of Literature: Textbook. Kyiv: Lebed, 2008. 488 p.