Republican Scientific and Practical Conference “Digital and Pedagogical Transformation and Research Models in Modern Education”

This conference is included in the “Plan of Scientific and Scientific-Technical Events to Be Held at the International and Republican Levels in 2026” pursuant to Order No. 11 of the Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Innovation of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated January 16, 2026, and was organized by the Department of Intellectual Disciplines and Information Technologies of Namangan State Pedagogical Institute on October 28–29, 2026.

1+ Issues
126+ Articles
150+ Participants
Oʻzbekcha

SUN’IY INTELLEKT VA TA’LIM ANALITIKASI ASOSIDA BO‘LAJAK INFORMATIKA O‘QITUVCHILARINING ALGORITMIK-DASTURLASH KOMPETENSIYASINI BAHOLASH MODELI

Published
29.10.2026
Journal
Republican Scientific and Practical Conference “Digital and Pedagogical Transformation and Research Models in Modern Education”
Issue
Republican Scientific and Practical Conference “Digital and Pedagogical Transformation and Research Models in Modern Education”
Pages
632-635
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.23939983

Authors

Abstract

Maqolada sun’iy intellekt va ta’lim analitikasi vositalari yordamida bo‘lajak informatika o‘qituvchilarining algoritmik-dasturlash kompetensiyasini baholash muammosi ko‘rib chiqilgan. An’anaviy baholashning yakuniy natijaga yo‘naltirilganligi va o‘quv jarayonini yetarlicha aks ettirmasligi asoslangan. Kompetensiyaning to‘rt komponenti bo‘yicha mezon va ko‘rsatkichlar, ma’lumot manbalari, integral ko‘rsatkichni hisoblash usuli va rivojlanganlik darajalaridan iborat baholash modeli taklif etilgan. Sun’iy intellekt yordamida baholashning pedagogik va etik shartlari belgilangan.

Keywords

algoritmik-dasturlash kompetensiyasi avtomatik baholash baholash modeli bo‘lajak informatika o‘qituvchisi integral ko‘rsatkich. raqamli iz sun’iy intellekt ta’lim analitikasi

Other language versions

Русский
В статье рассматривается проблема оценивания алгоритмическо-программистской компетенции будущих учителей информатики с помощью искусственного интеллекта и образовательной аналитики. Обоснована ориентированность традиционного оценивания на конечный результат и недостаточный учёт учебного процесса. Предложена модель оценивания, включающая критерии и показатели по четырём компонентам компетенции, источники данных, способ вычисления интегрального показателя и уровни сформированности. Определены педагогические и этические условия оценивания с применением искусственного интеллекта.
автоматическое оценивание алгоритмическо-программистская компетенция будущий учитель информатики интегральный показатель. искусственный интеллект модель оценивания образовательная аналитика цифровой след
English
The article addresses the problem of assessing the algorithmic-programming competence of pre-service computer science teachers by means of artificial intelligence and learning analytics. It argues that traditional assessment focuses on final results and does not sufficiently reflect the learning process. An assessment model is proposed, comprising criteria and indicators for the four components of the competence, data sources, a method for calculating an integral index and levels of competence development. Pedagogical and ethical conditions for AI-assisted assessment are defined.
algorithmic-programming competence artificial intelligence assessment model automated assessment digital footprint integral index. learning analytics pre-service computer science teacher

References

1. Siemens G., Long P. Penetrating the Fog: Analytics in Learning and Education // EDUCAUSE Review. – 2011. – Vol. 46, № 5. – P. 30–40.
2. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2024-yil 14-oktabrdagi PQ-358-son «2030-yilgacha sun’iy intellekt texnologiyalarini rivojlantirish strategiyasini tasdiqlash to‘g‘risida»gi qarori // https://lex.uz/docs/7158604
3. UNESCO. Guidance for generative AI in education and research. – Paris: UNESCO, 2023.
4. Kuralov Y.A. Bo‘lajak informatika o‘qituvchilarining dasturlashtirish kompetensiyasini rivojlantirish metodikasi: ped. fan. bo‘yicha fals. dok. (PhD) diss. avtoref. – Chirchiq, 2023.
5. Kuralov Y.A. Organization of control and evaluation of the formation of competencies in the process of teaching programming // Current Research Journal of Pedagogics. – 2023. – P. 72–76.
6. Brennan K., Resnick M. New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking // Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. – Vancouver, 2012.
7. Román-González M., Pérez-González J.C., Jiménez-Fernández C. Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the Computational Thinking Test // Computers in Human Behavior. – 2017. – Vol. 72. – P. 678–691.
8. Messer M., Brown N.C.C., Kölling M., Shi M. Automated Grading and Feedback Tools for Programming Education: A Systematic Review // ACM Transactions on Computing Education. – 2024. – Vol. 24, № 1. – Article 10.
9. Zawacki-Richter O., Marín V.I., Bond M., Gouverneur F. Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? // International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. – 2019. – Vol. 16. – Article 39.
View PDF Related articles