Oʻzbekcha
O‘ZBEK VA INGLIZ TILLARIDAGI FE’L KONSTRUKSIYALARINING GRAMMATIKALASHUVIDA KOGNITIV METONIMIYA VA PRAGMATIK INFERENSIYA
Journal
Filologiyaning dolzarb masalalari
Issue
“Filologiyaning dolzarb masalalari” mavzusidagi respublika ilmiy-amaliy anjumani
Abstract
Maqolada o‘zbek va ingliz tillaridagi fe’l konstruksiyalarining grammatikalashuvida pragmatik inferensiya va kognitiv metonimiyaning o‘rni qiyosiy tahlil qilinadi.
Keywords
grammatikalashuv
pragmatik inferensiya
kognitiv metonimiya
yengil fe’llar
yordamchi fe’llar
fe’l konstruksiyalari
konvensionallashuv
Русский
В статье сопоставительно рассматривается роль прагматического выведения смысла и когнитивной метонимии в грамматикализации глагольных конструкций узбекского и английского языков
грамматикализация
прагматическое выведение смысла
когнитивная метонимия
лёгкие глаголы
вспомогательные глаголы
глагольные конструкции
конвенционализация
English
The article compares the role of pragmatic inferencing and cognitive metonymy in the grammaticalization of verb constructions in Uzbek and English
grammaticalization
pragmatic inferencing
cognitive metonymy
light verbs
auxiliary verbs
verb constructions
conventionalization
1. Berlage, S. (2012). Noun phrase complexity in English. Cambridge University Press.
2. Bodrogligeti, A. (2003). An academic grammar of modern literary Uzbek. Lincom Europa.
3. Bonial, S. (2021). Light verbs and event structure. In The Oxford handbook of lexical semantics. Oxford University Press.
4. Bybee, J. (2006). From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82(4), 711–733.
5. Bybee, J. (2007). Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford University Press.
6. Bybee, J., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W. (1994). The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. University of Chicago Press.
7. Coşkun, M. V. (2000). Özbek Türkçesi grameri. Türk Dil Kurumu.
8. Gen Kaya, V. (2019). Uzbek auxiliary verbs and their grammatical functions.
9. Heine, B., & Kuteva, T. (2002). World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.
10. Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C. (2003). Grammaticalization (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
11. Johanson, L. (2006). Structural factors in Turkic language contacts.
12. Kopeć, K., & Guerrero Medina, C. (2025). Research on GIVE constructions.
13. Kuribayashi, Y. (2021). Research on grammaticalization in Uzbek.
14. Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L. L. (2012). Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing. In The Oxford handbook of pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
15. Stojanovska-Ilievska, S. (2025). Research on English give constructions.
16. Traugott, E. C. (2023). Research on grammaticalization and semantic-pragmatic change.
17. Traugott, E. C., & Dasher, R. B. (2002). Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge University Press.
18. Vandewalle, J. (2016). Research on Uzbek auxiliary verb constructions.
