Oʻzbekcha
INGLIZ VA O‘ZBEK MAQOLLARIDA SHART ERGASH GAPLAR ORQALI OGOHLANTIRISH VA VA‘DA: ILLOKUTSION KUCH NUQTAYI NAZARIDAN QIYOSIY TAHLIL
Journal
Filologiyaning dolzarb masalalari
Issue
“Filologiyaning dolzarb masalalari” mavzusidagi respublika ilmiy-amaliy anjumani
Abstract
Maqolada ingliz va o‘zbek xalq maqollarida uchraydigan shart ergash gaplarning — ingliz tilidagi if va o‘zbek tilidagi -sa/agar shakllarining — ogohlantirish va va‘da ifodalash vositasi sifatidagi o‘rni qiyosiy tahlil qilinadi. Nutq aktlari nazariyasi (Ostin, 1962; Serl, 1969, 1975) asosida ikki tildan 12 ta haqiqiy maqol (folklor to‘plamlari va tasdiqlangan lug‘atlar asosida tekshirilgan) tahlil qilindi. Natijalar shart maqollarning ikki illokutsion vazifasini ko‘rsatdi: ogohlantiruvchi maqollar bilvosita direktiv kuch, va‘da beruvchi maqollar esa bilvosita komissiv-rag‘batlantiruvchi kuch tashiydi. Ingliz tili buni analitik if-band, o‘zbek tili esa -sa qo‘shimchasi orqali sintetik ifodalaydi.
Keywords
shart ergash gap
maqol
paremiologiya
illokutsion kuch
ogohlantirish
va‘da
bilvosita nutq akti
ingliz tili
o‘zbek tili
Русский
В статье проводится сопоставительный анализ условных придаточных в английских и узбекских пословицах — английских конструкций с if и узбекских форм -sa/agar — как средства выражения предостережения и обещания. На основе теории речевых актов (Остин, 1962; Сёрл, 1969, 1975) рассмотрены двенадцать подлинных пословиц из обоих языков. Результаты показывают две иллокутивные функции: предостерегающие пословицы несут косвенную директивную силу, а пословицы-обещания — косвенную комиссивно-побудительную силу. Английский язык передаёт это аналитически, узбекский — синтетически, при помощи суффикса -sa.
условное придаточное предложение
пословица
паремиология
иллокутивная сила
предостережение
обещание
косвенный речевой акт
английский язык
узбекский язык
English
This paper offers a comparative analysis of conditional clauses in English and Uzbek proverbs — English if and Uzbek -sa/agar forms — as devices for expressing warning and promise. Drawing on speech act theory (Austin, 1962; Searle, 1969, 1975), it examines twelve authentic proverbs from both languages, verified against folklore compilations and standard phrase dictionaries. The results show two illocutionary functions: warning-type proverbs carry indirect directive force, while promise-type proverbs carry indirect commissive-exhortative force. English encodes this analytically through the if-clause, Uzbek synthetically through the -sa suffix
conditional clause
proverb
paremiology
illocutionary force
warning
promise
indirect speech act
English
Uzbek
1. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
2. Berdiqobilova, R. N. (2026). A comparative study of paremiological units in Uzbek and English. International Journal of Scientific Researchers, 15(02), 424–428.
3. Hosea 8:7 (King James Version).
4. Kuchkarova, M., & Usenmez, E. (2026). Pragmatic functions of directive speech acts in English, Uzbek, and Turkish. Eurasian Journal of Academic Research, 6(5), 7–13.
5. Mieder, W. (2004). Proverbs: A handbook. Greenwood Press.
6. Norrick, N. R. (1985). How proverbs mean: Semantic studies in English proverbs. Mouton.
7. Nuritdinova, S. X. (2026). History of proverb studies and modern paremiological approaches. International Journal of Literature and Languages, 6(01), 79–80.
8. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.
9. Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3: Speech acts (pp. 59–82). Academic Press.
10. Sohibov, H. T. (2024). Principle of conditional sentences in Uzbek and English. Journal of Science-Innovative Research in Uzbekistan, 2(5), 214–216.
11. Ubaydullayeva, O. (2026). Conditional relationships in current Uzbek and English. Synapses: Insights Across the Disciplines, 3(6), 181–187.
12. Uktamova, M. K. (2022). Linguocultural analysis of English and Uzbek proverbs. International Journal of Research in Commerce, IT, Engineering and Social Sciences, 16(11), 4–7.
13. Wierzbicka, A. (2003). Cross-cultural pragmatics: The semantics of human interaction (2nd ed.). Mouton de Gruyter.
14. Yoqubova, S., & Nishonova, S. (2025). Direct and indirect speech acts in English and Uzbek languages. Problems and Solutions of Scientific and Innovative Research, 2(10), 140–143.
15. Ziyouz.uz. (n.d.). O‘zbek xalq maqollari [Uzbek folk proverbs collection]. https://ziyouz.uz/hikmatlar/ozbek-xalq-maqollari/
