Oʻzbekcha
FOYDA TUSHUNCHASINING LINGVOMADANIY TIZIMDA QADRIYAT SIFATIDA SHAKLLANISHI
Journal
Zamonaviy fan: innovatsion yondashuvlar va yosh tadqiqotchilarning dolzarb izlanishlari
Issue
Zamonaviy fan: innovatsion yondashuvlar va yosh tadqiqotchilarning dolzarb izlanishlari
Abstract
Maqolada “foyda” tushunchasining o‘zbek lingvomadaniy tizimda qadriyat sifatida shakllanishi ingliz tili bilan qiyosda tahlil qilinadi. “Foyda” konseptining qadriyatli qatlami axloqiy-diniy asosda (halol foyda, baraka, savob) mustahkamlanishi va bu jarayonda o‘zlashma leksikaning o‘rni ochib beriladi
Keywords
axloqiy-diniy freym
konseptning qadriyatli qatlami
lingvomadaniyat
qadriyat
qiyosiy tahlil
“foyda” konsepti
Русский
В статье в сопоставлении с английским языком анализируется формирование концепта “выгода” (foyda) как ценности в узбекской лингвокультуре. Раскрывается закрепление ценностного слоя концепта на морально-религиозной основе и роль заимствованной лексики
концепт “выгода”
лингвокультура
морально-религиозный фрейм
ценностный слой концепта
ценность
English
The article examines, in comparison with English, the formation of the concept “benefit” (foyda) as a value within the Uzbek linguoculture. It shows how the value layer of the concept is consolidated on a moral-religious basis (lawful benefit, baraka, savob) and reveals the role of borrowed lexis in this process
comparative analysis
concept of benefit
linguoculture
moral-religious frame
value
value layer of the concept
1. Abidova R.K. A cross-cultural study of the speech act of gratitude in English and Uzbek // Aktual’nye voprosy sovremennoy nauki i obrazovaniya. – 2023. – B. 122–124.
2. Abidova R.K. The structure of SMS language (Short Message Service) in expressing gratitude // Sovremennye nauchnye issledovaniya: aktual’nye voprosy, dostizheniya i innovatsii. – 2023. – B. 96–97.
3. Bahramovna M.G. Ingliz tilida qiymat, jismoniy xususiyat, inson hatti-harakatlarini ifodalovchi sifatlar // Mahalliy va xalqaro konferensiyalar platformasi. – 2025. – №1. – B. 223–229.
4. Divanova M. A comparative semantic field analysis of “benefit” across English and Uzbek cultures // Innovation Science and Technology. – 2026. – Vol. 2, No. 6.
5. Divanova M.H. Lexical semantic characteristics of Arabisms in Uzbek and English languages // Science and Education. – 2023. – Vol. 4, No. 1. – B. 1185–1187.
6. Eshchanova M. Classical classifications of euphemisms: semantic, pragmatic and functional approaches // O‘zbekiston–2030: innovatsiya, fan va ta’lim istiqbollari: IV Respublika ilmiy-amaliy konferensiyasi materiallari. – 2025. – №1.4. – B. 113–115.
7. Matnazarova K. Types of tenor in discourse linguistics // Builders of the Future. – 2024. – Vol. 4, No. 4. – B. 138–141.
8. Rokhatoy A. Semantic and idiomatic features of interpreting phraseological units from English into Uzbek // Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT). – 2021. – Vol. 12, No. 4. – B. 89–92.
9. Карасик В.И. Языковой круг: личность, концепты, дискурс. – Волгоград: Перемена, 2002. – 477 с.
10. Маслова В.А. Лингвокультурология: Учеб. пособие. – М.: Академия, 2001. – 208 с.
11. Степанов Ю.С. Константы: Словарь русской культуры. 2-е изд. – М.: Академический проект, 2001. – 990 с.
