ENGLISH–KARAKALPAK LEGAL TERMINOLOGY: ISSUES OF MEANING, EQUIVALENCE AND TRANSLATION
Published
25.08.2026
Journal
Zamonaviy fan: innovatsion yondashuvlar va yosh tadqiqotchilarning dolzarb izlanishlari
Issue
Zamonaviy fan: innovatsion yondashuvlar va yosh tadqiqotchilarning dolzarb izlanishlari
Pages
681-682
Authors
Abstract
This study examines the intricate relationship between English Common Law and the Civil Law tradition represented in Karakalpak legal discourse, focusing on the underlying causes of semantic discrepancies and suggesting functional approaches to facilitate accurate and effective cross-cultural legal communication
Keywords
adequacy
comparative jurisprudence
functional equivalence
legal linguistics
semantic discrepancy
References
1.Alcaraz, E., & Hughes, B. Legal Translation Explained. Routledge. 2014
2. Bhatia, V. K. Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. Longman. 1993
3. Cao, D. Translating Law. Multilingual Matters. 2007
4.Garner, B. A. Black's Law Dictionary (11th ed.). Thomson Reuters. 2019
5. Karakalpakstan Republic. Civil Code of the Republic of Karakalpakstan. 2020
6. Mattila, H. E. S. Comparative Legal Linguistics: Language of Law, Latin and Modern Lingua Francas. Ashgate Publishing. 2013
7. Newmark, P. A Textbook of Translation. Prentice Hall.
8. Šarčević, S. New Approach to Legal Translation